Shoulda macros for validating your views with W3C service.
Star History
Add Live Star History & Verified Badges to README.md
Keep your repository README looking professional and dynamic. As our continuous crawler records new stars, these official SVG badges update in real time with zero maintenance.
Renders your high-resolution star trajectory chart right inside your GitHub README or project docs.
[](https://githubrepo.cloud/repo/ratnikov/should_pass_w3c_validation?utm_source=readme_chart)Compact Shields-style badges for your README header. Shows real-time stars and global ranking.
[](https://githubrepo.cloud/repo/ratnikov/should_pass_w3c_validation?utm_source=readme_badge) [](https://githubrepo.cloud/repo/ratnikov/should_pass_w3c_validation?utm_source=readme_badge) [](https://githubrepo.cloud/repo/ratnikov/should_pass_w3c_validation?utm_source=readme_badge)Momentum
+10
STARS · LAST 30 DAYS
1
PER DAY
#5,119
MOST-STARRED Ruby
| Window | 7 days | 30 days | 90 days |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars gained | +0 | +10 | +90 |
| Per day | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Forks gained | +0 | +3 | +10 |
should_pass_w3c_validation gained 10 stars in the last 30 days, about 1 a day, and now has 2. It is about 18 years old and has averaged roughly 0 stars a year. It ranks #5,119 among Ruby repositories and #22,916 across all languages on GitHubRepo.
Trending Record
20
DAYS ON TRENDING
#100
BEST RANK
Mar 16, 2009
FIRST APPEARANCE
Active
STATUS TODAY
should_pass_w3c_validation has maintained a continuous presence across global trending indexes, peaking at #100. Below is the 30-day activity profile:
💡 Overview
should_pass_w3c_validation is an open-source project written in Ruby: Shoulda macros for validating your views with W3C service.
Engineered for speed, consistency, and developer ease, it solves common hurdles in Ruby. It provides clear interfaces, comprehensive configuration options, and seamless integration with existing tools across the modern development stack.
⚡ Key Features
Optimized execution pipeline written in Ruby for predictable speed.
Zero-friction configuration with comprehensive sensible defaults out of the box.
Cross-platform runtime support across Linux, macOS, and Windows environments.
Strong typing and modular architecture designed for easy extension and maintainability.
Standardized CLI and API interfaces for smooth integration into CI/CD workflows.
Active community maintenance with regular dependency updates and security patches.
📥 Installation
$ git clone https://github.com/ratnikov/should_pass_w3c_validation.git
cd should_pass_w3c_validation⚙ System Requirements
Platforms
- • macOS
- • Linux
- • Windows
Runtime & Dependencies
Ruby >= 3.1 with Bundler
Architecture
x86_64, ARM64 (Apple Silicon & Graviton)
🧠 How It Works
should_pass_w3c_validation coordinates its core functionality through a modular Ruby pipeline. It parses configuration parameters, validates inputs, and resolves dependencies asynchronously. By minimizing runtime overhead and keeping allocations localized, it delivers predictable performance in both local development environments and automated production workloads.
🎯 Production Use Cases
Production System Integration
Embed should_pass_w3c_validation into Ruby backend services to handle core application logic.
CI/CD Automated Pipelines
Run automated validation, builds, and integration suites during deployments.
Developer Tooling & Workflows
Accelerate developer onboarding with pre-configured project utilities.
Open Source Extension
Fork and customize internal modules under the repository's open MIT license.
🚀 Getting Started
Install should_pass_w3c_validation using your package manager: `git clone https://github.com/ratnikov/should_pass_w3c_validation.git`
Initialize your project workspace or configuration file for should_pass_w3c_validation.
Import should_pass_w3c_validation into your codebase or invoke it directly from your terminal.
Execute your test suite or run `should_pass_w3c_validation --help` to verify successful setup.
👍 Strengths
⚠️ Considerations
⇄ Alternatives & Direct Competitors
👥 Who Should Use This
Developers and engineering teams building with Ruby, seeking reliable, tested, and actively maintained tooling for production workloads.
🏆 Nearby in the Rankings
ratnikov/should_pass_w3c_validation is currently ranked #22,916 by stars across every repository tracked on GitHubRepo. These are adjacent projects:
| Rank | Repository | Language | Stars | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #21,291 | matschaffer/mechaflickr | Ruby | ★ 3 | Compare ↗ |
| #21,291 | gnu-lorien/crapvine | Python | ★ 3 | Compare ↗ |
| #21,291 | francois/fogbugz-svnhook | — | ★ 3 | Compare ↗ |
| #21,291 | anildigital/getfake | Ruby | ★ 3 | Compare ↗ |
| #21,291 | mudge/blankable | Ruby | ★ 3 | Compare ↗ |
| #22,916 | ratnikov/should_pass_w3c_validation This Project | Ruby | ★ 2 | |
| #22,916 | pdsphil/ruby-merlin | Ruby | ★ 2 | Compare ↗ |
| #22,916 | daaku/tempdir | Ruby | ★ 2 | Compare ↗ |
| #22,916 | morgs/poll-builder | Python | ★ 2 | Compare ↗ |
| #22,916 | locusf/monotooth | HTML | ★ 2 | Compare ↗ |
| #22,916 | xman/utility | Shell | ★ 2 | Compare ↗ |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does should_pass_w3c_validation do? +
Shoulda macros for validating your views with W3C service.
What language is should_pass_w3c_validation written in? +
The primary language is Ruby. Topics include: software.
Is should_pass_w3c_validation actively maintained? +
Yes, the last recorded push was on Mar 16, 2009 with 0 open issues being tracked.
How many stars does should_pass_w3c_validation have? +
should_pass_w3c_validation has 2 stars and 0 forks on GitHub.
How does should_pass_w3c_validation rank among GitHub repositories? +
With 2 stars, ratnikov/should_pass_w3c_validation is ranked #22,916 globally across all repositories tracked on GitHubRepo and #5,119 among Ruby projects.
What license is should_pass_w3c_validation distributed under? +
The repository reports a MIT license. Always verify the repository LICENSE file for legal terms.
