Side-by-Side Comparison
xml_protected vs devdocs
Compare open source repositories side by side. Stars, forks, code health, licensing, and community growth.
Recorded Stars Comparison
● codemuseum/xml_protected (2)
● freeCodeCamp/devdocs (39.5K)
☆ 2xml_protected stars
☆ 39.5Kdevdocs stars
+39.5KDifference
devdocsStar Leader
Side-by-Side Facts
| Metric | codemuseum/xml_protected ↗ | freeCodeCamp/devdocs ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| Description | Keeps specified attributes of a model out of to_xml. Do so by aliasing to_xml, and automatically sending in the correct :excludes to the original to_xml method, e.g. :excludes => [:attr1, :attr2, ...] | API Documentation Browser |
| GitHub Stars | ☆ 2 | ☆ 39,490 |
| Forks | 1 | 2,644 |
| Open Issues | 0 | 197 |
| Main Language | Ruby | Ruby |
| License | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Last Push | Oct 1, 2008 | Sep 25, 2026 |
| GitHub Source | Open Source ↗ | Open Source ↗ |
Popular Comparisons
awesome-go vs ollama
avelino/awesome-go · ollama/ollama
ECC vs react
affaan-m/ECC · react/react
claw-code vs clash-verge-rev
ultraworkers/claw-code · clash-verge-rev/clash-verge-rev
freeCodeCamp vs deepseek-harness
freeCodeCamp/freeCodeCamp · deepseek-ai/deepseek-harness
public-apis vs free-programming-books
public-apis/public-apis · EbookFoundation/free-programming-books
From our network