Side-by-Side Comparison
pi-warden vs deepseek-harness
Compare open source repositories side by side. Stars, forks, code health, licensing, and community growth.
Recorded Stars Comparison
● DevMortimer/pi-warden (146)
● deepseek-ai/deepseek-harness (237.6K)
☆ 146pi-warden stars
☆ 237.6Kdeepseek-harness stars
+237.4KDifference
deepseek-harnessStar Leader
Side-by-Side Facts
| Metric | DevMortimer/pi-warden ↗ | deepseek-ai/deepseek-harness ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| Description | Guardrails for Pi that steer instead of interrupt: enforces your project rules on every write, holds only hard-to-undo actions (3 per 1,000 calls, measured on real sessions), catches unverified "done" claims and stuck loops, and trims tool output. Built on pi-typesafe. | DeepSeek Harness: Everything is a Plugin. |
| GitHub Stars | ☆ 146 | ☆ 237,585 |
| Forks | 19 | 28,545 |
| Open Issues | 5 | 0 |
| Main Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Last Push | Sep 26, 2026 | Sep 27, 2026 |
| GitHub Source | Open Source ↗ | Open Source ↗ |
Popular Comparisons
awesome-go vs ollama
avelino/awesome-go · ollama/ollama
ECC vs react
affaan-m/ECC · react/react
claw-code vs clash-verge-rev
ultraworkers/claw-code · clash-verge-rev/clash-verge-rev
freeCodeCamp vs deepseek-harness
freeCodeCamp/freeCodeCamp · deepseek-ai/deepseek-harness
public-apis vs free-programming-books
public-apis/public-apis · EbookFoundation/free-programming-books
From our network